To truly appreciate the advances offered by GCEA, there's nothing as illustrative as getting in there and running the numbers yourself. However, building a de-novo cost-effectiveness model can be a daunting task. 

Well, not to worry! Just in time for the ISPOR Annual Meeting 2025, we've released an easy-to-use GCEA calculator that allows you to explore and appreciate the societal value of innovative medicines, and underpin the key value drivers without building a full-on model. The GCEA calculator offers an interactive user interface that lets you customize your own GCEA. 

Stylus, a Raven company that emerged from stealth this week with funding from RA Capital and others, is positioned to overcome the existing limitations of genetic medicines with its suite of engineered recombinases that are designed to recognize a safe harbor site in the human genome and introduce a therapeutic payload with high specificity and integrity.

Understanding how investors use NPV to value drugs at various stages of drug development explains what CBO's and other analyses miss.

Last March, our Planetary Health team convened investors from 25 of Boston's leading climate tech firms for our own version of March Madness, to predict which planetary/climate tech sub-sectors would have the most successful 2024. Well, it's the moment we've all been waiting for. The results are in!

Wouldn’t it be better if everyone in our ecosystem were candid with one another?

After all, within companies it’s common to encourage everyone to speak their minds. If you see a problem, call it out; give honest feedback; feedback is a gift; people have a duty to dissent if they disagree with something. So, what stops this corporate if-you-see-something-say-something from going beyond managers and employees? If we normalized candor, we could learn more from one another, cross-pollinate best practices, and correct misunderstandings.

As we break for the holidays and begin to look forward to 2025, we're also taking a beat to look back on what most drew our readers' attention in 2024. 

Today, AbbVie announced it is acquiring Aliada for $1.4 billion, motivated by the potential for ALIA-1758, Aliada’s lead program, to be the best-in-class for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, and by the potential of the BBB-crossing platform to enhance its discovery and development efforts for other difficult-to-treat neurological diseases. As we congratulate the Aliada team, we wanted to share a bit more of the story behind the second significant acquisition from our Raven incubator this year and the first full-circle acquisition of a company we built with technology spun out from a larger company.

The many fees and expenses associated with running any company are more than just a headache. Particularly for R&D-intensive biotech companies, failing to stay on top of them can significantly saddle a company with unnecessary cash burn. A new video resource at RA Capital's free Gateway platform for boards and biotech leadership features industry leaders sharing their experiences navigating these pesky financial challenges.

A LinkedIn discussion about “crossover” financing rounds deepened my sense that we’re not all saying the same thing when we’re saying the same thing. And that’s a challenge, if not necessarily always a problem, in an industry that’s only becoming more scientifically and financially complex as it matures. Because to understand one another and avoid unnecessary hiccups it helps to have a common language.

Our usual top-down biotech sector metrics showed that 1H24 was… pretty boring (though for us bottom-up folks, individual companies offer plenty of excitement). After the last few years, boring ain’t bad. With expectations of Fed easing interest rates due to waning inflation, the excitement level for the second half of the year has already picked up, but that’s not reflected in the metrics here.

All else being equal, people care more about outcomes that happen in the near future than about outcomes that happen later. The discount rate represents how much timing matters. We sit down with Josh Cohen, Deputy Director of the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR) at the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center, and Research Professor of Medicine at Tufts University School of Medicine, to learn about how changes to the discount rate can alter how we value medicines.

This is the first acquisition of a fully-baked, “home-grown” company from RA Capital’s RAVen incubator, which builds companies that our venture team funds and helps govern, so we wanted to mark the occasion by sharing a bit more about how we got here. 

There is a real and urgent need for better flu prophylaxis and therapeutics. RA Managing Director Laura Tadvalkar writes about why RA is excited to lead a transformative transaction that returns a long-acting antiviral for flu to its original developer Cidara, and RA’s new initiative to help make outlicensing from pharma companies faster and more efficient.

It’s fairly typical for companies to share confidential data with investors of their choosing before completing financing transactions, before publicly disclosing the data or the financing. How is this fair? Shouldn’t everyone get a chance to see the data so that no investor gets a better deal than anyone else? Peter Kolchinsky and Sarah Reed break down what’s allowed, what’s common, and what’s logical.

We wanted to expand RA Capital’s Gateway library of teaching modules to cover compensation-related topics, so we peppered experienced board member Steve Hoffman with questions about everything from managing stock option grants to tying bonuses to stretch goals. His answers did not disappoint.

A year ago we published the first “Semper Maior” piece, making the case that biotech was on firm ground and ready for a reboot. We put out the second piece last summer, when it felt like the rebound was underway. Had the year ended in October or even November… well, you know. But here we are after a general market and XBI surge feeling like biotech is now truly recovering from its prolonged downturn. So let’s mine the data, as we have before, to get a sense of what happened in 2023 and what lessons to take with us into 2024.

There’s a convention that public biotech companies should plan to raise money by the time they get down to one year of cash left on their balance sheets to avoid a dreaded “going concern” clause in their financial statements. But if you’ve got data on the way, it’s not always necessary to try to raise cash - particularly if the only terms you can get are draconian. Here’s a roadmap for deliberately navigating through that one-year threshold, owning the clause, and letting your data guide your financing strategy.

We asked three Gateway members who are or have been on Audit Committees – Kim Drapkin (CEO, Graphite Bio), Adam Mostafa (CFO, X4 Pharmaceuticals), and Sen Sundaram (CEO, Terns Pharmaceuticals) – to offer their best advice on Audit-related topics.

The technological renaissance in covalent inhibitor technology over the past decade is impressive. Relatively recent advances in structure-based drug design have unlocked the tantalizing opportunity to engineer covalency into small molecules. Now, RA Capital has incubated and seeded Hyku Biosciences to unlock histidines, tyrosines, and lysines for covalent modification to greatly expand the druggable proteome.

Silverback Therapeutics’s wind-down and reverse merger process can serve as a template for other companies when their clinical trials fail. The company’s response to its setback also teaches us about scenario planning, the importance of moving quickly when a key program doesn’t deliver hoped-for data, and why we should look ahead to a biotech ecosystem that anticipates the consequences of – and opportunities stemming from – its inevitable clinical setbacks.